Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Hirschberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion by the defendants, Augusta Hirschberg and another, for a new trial on a case containing exceptions, ordered to be heard at the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of Hew York in the first instance upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court after a trial at a Trial Term of the Court of Common Pleas on the 15th day of May, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

This cause was tried in the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of Hew York and resulted in the direction by the trial judge of a verdict for the plaintiff, subject to the' opinion, of the court at General Term.

*520Erom the record before us we understand the facts to be: That Mr. Bradley, a cloth manufacturer at Leeds, in England, and the assignor of the plaintiff herein, employed one Beaumont of the city of Mew York to make sales of goods in the United States of America and Ganada. In January, 1890, Beaumont called upon the defendants, who were cap manufacturéis in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. George D. Putnam & Co. v. French & MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. TankNew York County Court, Onondaga County · 1911
  2. Heyl v. TaylorAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  3. Eleventh Ward Bank v. HeatherAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  4. Zilberman v. FriedmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API