Legal Opinion

Spencer v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] IN BANC.

The plaintiff brought this suit to enjoin the defendant City of Portland from appropriating certain of her lands for the purpose of widening East Broadway and East Larrabee Streets as approaches to the Broadway bridge spanning the Willamette River.

In the proceedings to condemn plaintiff's real property, her damages were determined to be $13,550, and the benefits inuring to her were fixed at $450. She does not complain as to the assessment of benefits,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Logan v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. United States v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Waybrant v. BernsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. City of Portland v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Knapp v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ollilo v. Clatskanie Peoples' Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API