Legal Opinion
Republic of China v. American Exp. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 24, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUGARMAN, District Judge.
The pleadings herein disclose allegations in the complaint and admissions, denials, a defense and a counterclaim in the answer as follows: allegations that (a) the National Government at Formosa is the lawful government of the Republic of China, and (b) Directorate General of Postal Remittances and Savings Bank is a department of the postal system of said Government ; to which allegations defendant pleads lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief. It is further alleged that (c) neither plaintiff is a citizen, resident or inhabitant of the United…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hanna v. . StedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Dorn v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Sherman Nat. Bank of New York v. Shubert Theatrical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- A/S Krediit Pank v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- 6247 Atlas Corp. v. Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- H. Arnold Guy and Cato Development Corporation v. Citizens Fidelity Bank and Trust Company v. James M. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.