Legal Opinion

Eardley v. Eardley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1952No. 12469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit began by an instrument styled, Receivers’ Report, Re: Stock. In 1947 the partnership of A. Eardley Company, composed of Mrs. Elizabeth M. Eardley and Belle Eardley, was placed in the hands of two receivers, R. T. Hall and Joe L. Gardner. There has been litigation heretofore with reference to the receivership of this partnership. See, Booth Fisheries v. Eardley, Tex.Civ.App., 233 S.W.2d 872, and Dimmit Supply Company v. Eardley, Tex.Civ.App., 241 S.W.2d 648. The A. Eardley Company partnership was a large concern and owned a great deal of property in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booth Fisheries Corp. v. EardleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. MassadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Dimmit Supply Co. v. EardleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michael Keith Hahn v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  2. Texas Department of State Health Services and David L. Lakey, M.D., Commissioner v. Nancy Holmes, CLHRP, CME, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API