Legal Opinion

Harvey Jackson Torix v. Ball Corporation, an Indiana Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1988No. 86-2681PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

I

Plaintiff Harvey Jackson Torix appeals a judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma in favor of defendant Ball Corporation following a non-jury trial. Mr. Torix had applied for, and been denied, disability benefits under a pension plan organized by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. In Re White Farm Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Clark Ray Helms and Betty Helms v. Monsanto Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Gordon T. Dockray v. Phelps Dodge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Anita Markham v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Doyle v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Herbert Vanderklok, Cross-Appellee v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co., Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. June Saffle v. Sierra Pacific Power Company Bargaining Unit Long Term Disability Income PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API