Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bonnin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 21, 1982No. Misc. (BV) No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for Disciplinary Action, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9, against Robbin James Bonnin, alleging violations of the Disciplinary Rules, of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The matter was referred to Judge John J. Mitchell of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to make findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Maryland Rule BV10. After an evidentiary hearing, Judge Mitchell made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.1

"1. The Respondent was retained by Mr. and Mrs. Robert Yearick to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BurkaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PollackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API