Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 1, 1984No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 4, September Term, 1983Published
1Opinion of the Court
299 Md. 731 (1984)
475 A.2d 466
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
v.
CHARLES P. HOWARD, JR.
Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 4, September Term, 1983.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
June 1, 1984.
Charles P. Howard, Jr., Baltimore, respondent.
Glenn M. Grossman, Asst. Bar Counsel, Annapolis (Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, Annapolis, on the petition), for petitioner.
Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ.
DAVIDSON, Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission (Commission) through Bar Counsel filed a petition for disciplinary action against the respondent, Charles…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KerpelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- C & H Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PattisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.