Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 20, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-7222PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Ford Motor Company (Defendant) moves to dismiss various counts in the present Complaint: Count I — breach of express warranty — as to all but Jason Schmidt; Counts II, IV, and V — claims of breach of implied warranty under Pennsylvania, California, and Arkansas law, respectively; Counts VI, VII, and VIII— claims of fraud and violations of Pennsylvania, California, and Arkansas state consumer protection laws, respectively; Counts IX, X, and XI — claims of negligent misrepresentation under Pennsylvania, Illinois, and California law, respectively; and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Whitaker v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re Myford Touch Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- McLaughlin v. Bayer Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- In re Takata Airbag Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.