Webb v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this class action employment discrimination action have filed several motions to compel discovery pursuant to Fed. *433R.Civ.P. 37. Following a conference held in chambers for the purpose of discussing the discovery disputes which have arisen, we now issue this memorandum stating our disposition of the motions.
Defendant Westinghouse’s objections to plaintiffs’ discovery requests fall roughly into two major categories. First, Westinghouse objects to much of the discovery on the ground that the information requested consists of “self-critical…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
- Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
3Cited by51 opinions
- Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company and Interstate Equipment Corporation and Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Harding v. Dana Transport, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Hardy v. New York News Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.