Legal Opinion

McPike v. Avery

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1925No. 12189PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MAXEY, O.

The plaintiff in this suit seeks to recover a strip of ground 30 feet wide adjoining- and coterminous with lot 9, block 1, Morningside addition to the city of Tulsa. Tlie defendant Avery answered and deraigned his title to said ¿Moot strip of land, showing /that said 30-foot strip of land was originally a part of Laurel street in said addition. The parties entered into an agreed statement of facts, upon which the case was tried, with some additional testimony, which will hereafter be noticed. The agreed statement of facts, upon which the ease was tried is as follows:

“It is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. White v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. PatchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Hagen v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Elliott v. McIntoshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Askins v. British-American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  2. WRT Realty, Inc. v. Boston Investment Group II, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Gill v. GiacomoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  4. Farrar v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API