Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Ioerger

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 15, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

Appellee’s petition is the ordinary form in a suit on a promissory note. Appellants filed answer and counterclaim in three divisions. The first two divisions are each a general 'denial, which is eventually disposed of by a pleading in which ajipellants admitted the due execution of the note. The third division is an alleged counterclaim, claiming damages in the amount of $2,000 for. the violation of a contract between appellee and appellants on an exchange of real estate. This third division was later withdrawn. Later, Ioerger, one of the appellants, filed a further answer and counterclaim,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. James & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Sullivan v. NicoulinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Cawker City State Bank v. JenningsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Cohn v. BrombergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Jenkins v. BarrowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BW Acceptance Corporation v. SaluriSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Harriman v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Jordison v. Jordison Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API