Legal Opinion

Jordison v. Jordison Bros.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 7, 1933No. 41695PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

— The defenses made are: (1) A specific and general denial that any loan has been made; (2) if any money were advanced by the plaintiff, it was to her husband individually and not to the copartnership; (3) a counterclaim was pleaded.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows:

Arthur, John, Ethel Jordison, and Sarah Anderson are brothers and sisters, who, under the firm name of “Jordison Brothers,” operated a retail store in the village of Coalville from June, 1929, to May 6, 1931, when the store was closed. Lillian Jordison, the plaintiff, is the wife of Arthur Jordison, one of the members of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. McVickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Shaw v. IoergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. BW Acceptance Corporation v. SaluriSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Martin v. MomyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. First Nat. Bank of Indianola v. MaloneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Schalk v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Read v. FergusonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API