Jenkins v. Barrows
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Glarke District Gov/rt— Hon. John W. Harvey, Judge. Action to reeoveT for work done, and for horses sold. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, Oh. J.
The plaintiff alleges that he worked for the defendants, D. 0. Barrows and Mosely Chase, as partners; from December 2, 1881, to September 22, 1882, for which there has become due him the sum of $173.33; and, also, that he sold and delivered to the defendants two horses, at the agreed price of $100 each. The defendants denied the allegations of the petition, and the defendant Barrows filed a counter-claim for board of the plaintiff and his horses.
1. pleading: what1s"not?! stricken out. I. The plaintiff moved to strike out the counter-claim, and the motion was sustained. The…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Armstrong v. James & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Kauffman v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Hammond v. VetsburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Shaw v. IoergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Brace v. DobleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.