Legal Opinion
Oracle Corp. v. Falotti
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 17, 2001No. C 00-02345 WHAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF ORACLE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANT PIER C. FALOTTI’S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this employment case involving both Swiss and California law, this order GRANTS plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and DENIES defendant’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment.
STATEMENT
Plaintiff Oracle Corporation seeks a declaratory judgment that it does not owe any unvested stock options to defendant Pier Carlo Falotti, a former high-level executive, who Oracle terminated. Mr.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Scarfo v. Cabletron Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Mark Scully v. Us Wats, Inc. Kevin O'hare, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Us Wats Aaron Brown, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Us Wats Stephen Parker, Individually and in His Capacity as Executive Vice-President of Us WatsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Malmstrom v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Expeditors International of Washington Inc v. SantillanaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- TVN Entertainment Corp. v. General Star Indemity Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003