Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Hurst

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Circuit Court, Spink. County. Hon. Ci-ias. . S. WhitiNG, Judge. Replevin by George Palmer and Fred Palmer against J. C. Hurst, sheriff of Spink County. Judgment, for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFulrer, J.

Alleging ownership in common and the right of immediate possession, appellants brought this action to recover certain cattle seized by the sheriff as the property of their father, William Palmer; and this appeal is from a judgment in favor of respondent and from an order overruling their motion for a new trial. ■ ,

Relevant to the issue of ownership and unity of interest, evidence was properly admitted which tends to.show that William Palmer and each appellant had at different times personally listed certain of the cattle for taxation as his property in severalty, and it is conceded that all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spooner v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Uhe v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Deyerle v. HuntMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Mosteller v. HolbornSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Eakin v. EakinIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bourcy v. KaufmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API