Legal Opinion

Deyerle v. Hunt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Cass Circioit Court. — Hon. Chas. W. Sloan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.

— This is an action of replevin to recover the possession of twenty-five hundred bushels of shucked corn in the crib. There was a trial and judgment for plaintiffs, from which defendants appealed.

The defendants have assigned for error a number of the .rulings of the trial court against them, but the principal of these, as we understand it, is that by which was refused an instruction asked by the defendants, which told the jury that if they shall believe from the evidence that the plaintiff Porter had no money invested in said corn at the time of bringing this suit, nor had any other interest…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pier v. HeinrichoffenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Donnell v. HarsheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Dwinel v. StoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
  4. Fawcett, Isham & Co. v. Osborn, Adams & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1863
  5. McDonald v. MatneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Missouri Bottlers' Ass'n v. FennertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Nugent v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Kelley v. VandiverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Holton v. GuinnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1896
  5. Johnson v. St. Joseph Stock Yards BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API