Swartout v. City of Spokane
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
— On December 23, 1974, the city council of Spokane adopted an ordinance imposing a tax on social card games. Because of an emergency provision, the ordinance was effective immediately. Dennis Swartout, who owned and operated a cardroom, brought this action to declare the ordinance invalid. The trial court did so and ordered the City to refund the taxes paid by Mr. Swartout; however, his claim for interest and attorney's fees was denied. Both parties appeal.
Their appeals present these questions: (1) Was the emergency clause of the ordinance invalid? (2) If so, is the savings clause effective?…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Unida v. VolpeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
- State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Federal Way v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Hyde v. Wellpinit School District No. 49Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Citizens for Responsible Government v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.