Legal Opinion

Swartout v. City of Spokane

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 1, 1978No. 2492-3PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

— On December 23, 1974, the city council of Spokane adopted an ordinance imposing a tax on social card games. Because of an emergency provision, the ordinance was effective immediately. Dennis Swartout, who owned and operated a cardroom, brought this action to declare the ordinance invalid. The trial court did so and ordered the City to refund the taxes paid by Mr. Swartout; however, his claim for interest and attorney's fees was denied. Both parties appeal.

Their appeals present these questions: (1) Was the emergency clause of the ordinance invalid? (2) If so, is the savings clause effective?…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Unida v. VolpeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972
  3. State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Federal Way v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Carrillo v. City of Ocean ShoresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Hyde v. Wellpinit School District No. 49Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. Citizens for Responsible Government v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API