Legal Opinion

State v. Fogg

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The respondent was indicted for failure to account to his employers, retail grain merchants, for moneys received in payment for goods delivered by him to a number of customers. The defendant excepted to the following passage in the opening statement of the state’s counsel: “And then directly after that a Broderick . . . account, showed up . . . that had been paid; and so . . . the bookkeeper there, went to Mrs. Broderick’s and Mrs. Broderick told her, as she will tell you here, that she had paid that.” The ground of the exception is the incompetence as evidence of the statement made by Mrs.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Stover v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Commonwealth Electric Co. v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. People v. . TrybusNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Commonwealth v. BonnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GliddenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. State v. MannionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. State v. CassSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. State v. HaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  5. State v. TravisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API