Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Erickson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1920No. Civ. No. 3007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County dissolving an attachment. Grant Jackson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appeal .from an order dissolving an attachment issued at the instance of the plaintiff.

[1] The action was brought in the superior court of the county of Los Angeles and the cause of action stated was upon liability created by a judgment, which judgment was entered against defendant in the state of Washington. Plaintiff, as a prerequisite to the issuance of the attachment, made her affidavit in which she alleged that her claim was “for money due, owing, and unpaid on account of judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff and ■ against the defendant, and that such contract was made and is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eck v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Tuller v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bean v. LoryeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Meyer v. BrooksOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Dulton v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Snapp v. KidderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API