Legal Opinion

Snapp v. Kidder

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8076PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal was placed upon a special calendar of this court upon an order to the respondents to show cause why the judgment herein should not be reversed, or that such order be made as might be meet in the premises. At the time of the placing of said cause upon said calendar, and the entry of said order, it appeared that the appellants’ brief had been filed herein, but that no brief on behalf of the respondents had been filed, although the time for the filing of such brief under the rules of this court had long since expired. The respondents failed to appear upon the calling of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eck v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Tuller v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Drake v. De WittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Atwood v. Little Bonanza Quicksilver Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Erickson v. EricksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Industrial Sales Corp. v. Airscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. O'Steen v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API