Legal Opinion
Sanai v. Sanai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 2005No. Nos. 03-35797, 03-35932, 04-35041, 04-35881PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
1. The following orders are non-final and beyond our jurisdiction to review:
a. The May 15, 2003 order releasing the lis pendens. See Special Inv., Inc. v. Aero Air, Inc., 360 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2004). The order is not appealable as an injunction. See Shee Atika v. Sealaska Corp., 39 F.3d 247, 248 (9th Cir.1994) (describing jurisdiction over orders where the language of 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) is satisfied).
b. The October 17, 2003 protective order. See Admiral Ins. Co. v. United States Dist. Court, 881 F.2d 1486, 1490 (9th Cir.1989) (describing discovery orders as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SanaiWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SanaiOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SanaiWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- In re SanaiOregon Supreme Court · 2016