Legal Opinion

State v. Fuller

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2018No. Docket 44172PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

*959 In this appeal, the State challenges the Kootenai County district court's decision to grant Antonia Kate Fuller's motion to suppress evidence seized during a traffic stop. Because we conclude the traffic stop was unconstitutional, we affirm the district court's order suppressing the evidence.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On December 6, 2015, Deputy Harvey Ballman of the Kootenai County Sheriff's Department was patrolling the area near the intersection of Highways 95 and 53 in Kootenai County. At approximately 10:50 p.m., Deputy Ballman was traveling westbound on…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. Victor Garcia-RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. HenageIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HoskinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. IslasIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. DevanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API