State v. Hoskins
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Chief Justice.
Justin K. Hoskins appeals the Bannock County district court's denial of his motion to suppress. The State argued that Hoskins lacked standing to object to the search based on consent and the district court denied the motion on that basis. On appeal, all parties agree the district court's ruling on standing was erroneous. Nevertheless, the State argues that the district court's decision can be affirmed based on the plain-view doctrine. Hoskins objects and argues that the State forfeited this argument by failing to raise it below. Hoskins prevailed at the Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. PerryIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Victor Garcia-RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. WeaverIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GonzalezIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- State v. HowardIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. MaximIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. FoellerIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. RamosIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. VivianIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.