Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Radu
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 2, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 28, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, which reversed a decision of an Administrative Law Judge and ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her employment as an operations typist for an environmental contractor due to misconduct. The employer testified…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of ElewaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of JacqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of EppsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of SilbermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of BecotteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.