Legal Opinion

Nicole M. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1999No. H019268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

90 Cal.Rptr.2d 922 (1999)

76 Cal.App.4th 1238

NICOLE M., Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Defendant and Respondent.

No. H019268.

Court of Appeal, Sixth District.

December 13, 1999.

Allen H. Fleishman, Heidi R. Larson, Law Offices of Allen H. Fleishman, San Jose, for Appellant Nicole M.

Harrington, Foxx, Dubrow & Canter, Henry A. Wirta, Jr., Elizabeth J. Miller, Los Angeles, for Respondent Sears, Roebuck & Co.

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff Nicole M. appeals after entry of a summary judgment in favor of defendant Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears). Plaintiff asserts that Sears could…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Jacmar Pacific Pizza Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Friedman v. Merck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Friedman v. Merck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Alvarez v. Jacmar Pacific Pizza Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Alvarez v. Jacmar Pacific Pizza Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API