Legal Opinion

State v. M. G. (In re M. G.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2019No. A166688PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAoyagi, J.

*715Appellant seeks reversal of an order continuing his commitment to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed *125180 days, based on his being a person with mental illness and needing further treatment. In his single assignment of error, appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the order. We agree and, accordingly, reverse.

Unless we exercise our discretion to review de novo , which we do not in this case, we view the evidence and permissible inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the trial court's disposition to determine whether the record,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. HittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. J. T. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. D. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. A. M. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. State v. H. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. L. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. S. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. A. M. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API