Legal Opinion

State v. Tilden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1999No. WD 51633PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

The issue at the heart of this criminal appeal is whether, under the United States Constitution and Missouri’s constitution and statutes, there was sufficient evidence to support a reasonable cause belief that the defendant was not mentally competent to understand the proceedings or able to assist in his defense, thereby requiring defendant’s counsel to challenge his competence, or in the alternative, mandate the court to sua sponte order a psychiatric examination at or prior to trial or sentencing.

In a nutshell, a defendant’s Constitutional due process rights to a fair…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Woods v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Elam v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API