Legal Opinion
United States v. West
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided June 20, 2000No. 2:95-cr-00091PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
On May 18, 2000, within minutes after this court, pursuant to the express mandate of the Eleventh Circuit, re-sentenced defendant, Roy Mack West (“West” or “defendant”), a pre-prepared motion for a new trial, invoking Rule 33, F.R.Cr.P., was filed. The court now considers West’s said motion.
On August 23-, 1995, when the jury found West guilty under both Counts One and Two of the indictment, Rule 33 read as follows:
Rule 33. New Trial
The court on motion of a defendant may grant a new trial to that defendant if required in the interest of justice. If trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Jimmy Lee Nixon, Richard Nixon, Michael Parks, Emmitt Lamar Manns, Henry L. Manns, Michael Keeley, Gerald WellsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Miguel Lara-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Marvin Percival Johnson, Kathleen M. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. J. Marshall BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Ljupco RistovskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Dean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- WILLIAMS v. DIRECTOR VIRGIN ISLANDS BUREAU OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2024