Legal Opinion

People v. MacIas

California Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1997No. S055400PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We decide here whether the prosecution may impeach a minor defendant at a criminal trial with the inconsistent statements he made to a probation officer who was evaluating him in preparation for a juvenile court fitness hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 707, subdivision *743(c) (section 707(c)).1 We have ruled that a minor’s statements made during a fitness evaluation may not be used as substantive evidence of guilt against the minor at a subsequent criminal trial. (Ramona R. v. Superior Court (1985) 37 Cal.3d 802, 810 [210 Cal.Rptr. 204, 693 P.2d 789] (Ramona…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. FarnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API