Legal Opinion

Chalmers v. Chalmers

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1997No. 96-358PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The issues in this case concern whether a promissory note was delivered, and if so, whether the interest specified was usurious thus rendering the note unenforceable. We affirm the Chancellor’s decision that the note was delivered and that the interest charged was not usurious.

Appellant Hugh B. Chalmers issued a promissory note to his father, Hugh J. Chalmers, now deceased, in the amount of $50,000. The note was payable upon demand or within sixty days of the death of Hugh J. Chalmers. The note, dated January 1, 1975, provided for interest at 10% per year. According to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McElroy v. GrishamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Boling v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Riddick v. StreettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Brown v. City of StuttgartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Irvin v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bellis v. BellisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Peterson v. PeckCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API