Edge Moor Iron Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtHat, Judge
The facts are fully set forth in the findings. It is not denied that the United States caused the delay whereby the plaintiff incurred the losses, which it has fully proved. The defendant does not question the amount of these losses. The law governing such cases is well established.
The work was to be completed within a specified number of days. The plaintiff did not need an extension of time, but was ready to perform within the period of time stipulated in the contract. It could not perform by reason of the delay caused by the United States. And in construing the contract the same principles…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Karno-Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
- Byrne v. Bellingham Consolidated School District No. 301Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Rice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941