Legal Opinion

United States v. Algie

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided December 3, 1980No. 6:06-misc-00007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERTELSMAN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The primary issue before the court in this matter is whether the court may invoke its inherent powers and the provisions of Rules 102 and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence in fulfilling its ethical obligation “to insist that court officials, litigants and their lawyers cooperate” with the court to achieve the goal of “prompt disposition of the court’s business.” 1

This is an issue of first impression, the resolution of which is fraught with grave importance for the administration of justice in the Eastern District of Kentucky and in other courts, state…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. HardageDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1990
  3. United States v. ReavesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1986
  4. Martin v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Virginia Benedict and Leonard Benedict v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API