Legal Opinion

United States v. Alexander

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1981No. 79-1280, 80-116PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

At the request of the government, we review in this criminal case two pretrial orders, 1 one suppressing appellee’s statements and the other directing production of a witness’ grand jury testimony. Appellee is charged with murder in the second-degree while armed. At trial, she intends to show that she acted in self-defense. After a hearing and extensive briefs arguing alleged violations of appellee’s Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights, the trial court concluded, under Miranda 2 and its progeny, that appellee’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated. However, the court…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. LoukWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. LoukWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lawrence v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hammill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Hawthorne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API