Legal Opinion
Freidzon v. Lukoil
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 23, 2016No. 15-1911-cvPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant Max Freidzon appeals the judgment of the district court entered on March 19, 2015, in favor of defendants-appellees OAO LUKOIL, LUKOIL North America, LLC, OAO Gazprom, JSC Gazprom Neft, and Gaspromneft-Aero (collectively, “defendants”) dismissing his complaint. Eighty-five days later, on June 12, 2015, Freidzon filed his notice of appeal. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.
In a civil case in which the United States is not a party, Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Endicott Johnson Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Franklin v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Servs. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017