Legal Opinion
Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 8, 2017No. 16–658PublishedCited by 169 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg
This case presents a question of time, specifically, time to file a notice of appeal from a district court's judgment. In Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 210-213, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007), this Court clarified that an appeal filing deadline prescribed by statute will be regarded as "jurisdictional," meaning that late filing of the appeal notice necessitates dismissal of the appeal. But a time limit prescribed only in a court-made rule, Bowles acknowledged, is not jurisdictional; it is, instead, a mandatory claim-processing rule subject to forfeiture if not properly raised by the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- Lindsey Hoyt v. Lane Construction CorporatiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Leonard OliverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Prime Rate Premium Fin. Corp., Inc. v. Karen LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- June Newirth v. Aegis Senior Communities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- John Williams v. Randy WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.