Legal Opinion

Oxford v. Williams Companies, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided June 29, 2001No. 1:99-cv-00648PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COBB, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Hubert Oxford III and Joseph D. Johnson, Jr., brought this purported class action suit in Texas state court attacking the creation of a fiber optic cable network by the primary defendant, Williams Companies, Inc., and subsequently sold to MCI WorldCom in 1995. Defendants have filed motions for summary judgment, and the plaintiffs have filed a motion to dismiss without prejudice. FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(2). The court, having reviewed the motions and responses on file, and having heard oral argument by counsel, is of the opinion that the defendants’…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric LLC v. Bluebonnet Drive, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  2. Bobo v. Christus HealthDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2005
  3. CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric LLC and SprintCom, Inc. v. Bluebonnet Drive, Ltd., and Petro-Guard Company, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API