Legal Opinion

State v. Hodge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1966No. 578, 579PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants do not contend that the attorneys who represented them in the Superior Court were incompetent; neither do they contend that they were unduly influenced or misinformed when they waived the finding of a bill by the grand jury and entered their pleas of guilty to the charge contained in the information. On the contrary, upon the oral argument, counsel expressly repudiated any such contention; nor have defendants asserted their innocence of the charge. In requiring that their sentences be appealed to this Court, defendants are merely taking advantage of the unlimited right of appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. DarnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1846

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API