Legal Opinion

United States v. R. H. Comey Brooklyn Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 11, 1928No. 3045PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise in this case, a large number of pieces of hemp braid, was imported and entered for warehouse January 26, 1923. June 16 following it was withdrawn from warehouse on an entry for consumption and the duties then paid. The appellee here, who is the manufacturer and exporter, thereafter manufactured the braid by bleaching the same and exported it from the United States June 30, 1926, under claim for drawback. The collector refused to allow the drawback on the ground that the manufactured braid was exported more than three years after the delivery from warehouse, at which time the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. National Lead Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kerr-Gifford & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  2. Rosenberg v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Tapscott's H. A. Gogarty, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Crescent Burlap Bag Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API