Legal Opinion

Tapscott's H. A. Gogarty, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 29, 1953No. C. D. 1552PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EKwall, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States in which it is claimed that an allowance in duties should have been made under the provisions of section 506 (1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for merchandise alleged to have been abandoned by the importer and destroyed. The Government contends that the plaintiffs have failed to comply with the provisions of that section, and the regulations issued thereunder, and are thus not entitled to any relief.

The pertinent provision of the Tariff Act of 1930 is as follows:

SEC. 506. ALLOWANCE FOR ABANDONMENT AND DAMAGE.

Allowance shall be made in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Morris European & American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Helvering v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  3. Goltra v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  4. United States v. R. H. Comey Brooklyn Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Ellis v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Capital Rock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Premier Doll Accessories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API