Legal Opinion

Crescent Burlap Bag Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 28, 1958No. C. D. 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The above-entitled protest is directed against the refusal of the collector of customs to allow drawback under the provisions of section 313 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 upon the exportation of certain burlap bags claimed to have been manufactured in the United- States with the use of imported, duty-paid materials.

There does not seem to be any question but that drawback was denied solely for the reason that the plaintiff failed to comply with the provisions of section 22.7 (a) of the Customs Regulations of 1943, which were in force and effect at the times here pertinent (they…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. R. H. Comey Brooklyn Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. William E. Martin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schnitzer Steel Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API