People v. Hinkel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant Bruce Hinkel pleaded no contest to possession of cocaine base (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)), being under the influence of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11550, subd. (a)), and driving an unregistered vehicle (Veh. Code, § 4000, subd. (a)). The court deferred entry of judgment and ordered defendant to participate in a drug treatment program. (Pen. Code, § 1000 et seq.; all unspecified statutory references are to the Penal Code.) After defendant’s probation officer filed a notice of unsatisfactory diversion and moved…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Kertesz v. OstrovskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- ZC Real State Tax Solutions Ltd. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. BeatyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. StrongAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2006
- People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006