People v. Beaty
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WISEMAN, J.
—We consider whether an authorized medical marijuana user is, based on that fact alone, unamenable for drug recovery treatment and therefore not an appropriate candidate for Proposition 36 1 probation. Although the medical use of marijuana may be considered by the court in establishing the terms and conditions of probation under Prop. 36 and in crafting the treatment to be provided, we conclude the authorized use of medical marijuana does not by itself make a nonviolent drug offender unamenable to the treatment mandated by Prop. 36.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL HISTORIES
In 2007,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. EubanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. LealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Oseguera CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015