Legal Opinion

Collogan v. Branscom

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided May 1, 2023No. 7:23-cv-00215Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION NATHANIEL COLLOGAN, ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 7:23-cv-00215 ) v. ) ) By: Michael F. Urbanski JOEL BRANSCOM, et al., ) Chief United States District Judge Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Nathaniel Collogan, proceeding pro se, commenced this action by filing a form complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against his attorney, Craig Leisure, and Botetourt County Circuit Court Judge Joel Branscom. Collogan has not paid the filing fee but will be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of initial review…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API