Legal Opinion

United States v. Morales-Palacios

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 28, 2004No. 03-20195PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:

Cipriano Morales-Palacios (“Morales”) appeals his conviction of attempted illegal reentry into the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Previously, in United States v. Trevino-Martinez, we held that section 1326 does not require the government to prove specific intent in the context of a completed reentry. 86 F.3d 65, 68-69 (5th Cir.1996). In the current action, Morales asserts that under section 1326 the offense of attempted illegal reentry — unlike completed reentry — is a specific intent crime because it embodies the common law…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. De Jesus-BatresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. GuidryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. State National Insurance v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API