Callahan v. La Crosse Trust Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRector, J.
The appeal of the Trust Company from the order extending the time for filing the bill of exceptions is without merit. We need not consider whether the trial court properly extended the time upon the ground that good cause was shown as required by sec. 269.45, Stats. The service of notice of entry of judgment upon Mr. Schlabach, as attorney for the objectors, was made by mailing him the original and a copy of the notice with a request that he admit service. • Some days later he admitted “due service” of the paper. Sec: 269.34 (4) provides for service by mail “where the person making the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Will of MarvinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Banking Commission v. FlanaganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Rauchfuss v. GiffordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Beilfuss v. DinnauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Lundquist v. Children's Home of the Illinois Conference of the Swedish Evangelical Mission Covenant of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flatley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Estate of YahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Beloit Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Estate of HatzlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- In Matter of Estate of GoldsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.