Legal Opinion

City of Flint v. Takacs

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1989No. Docket 96506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holbrook, Jr., J.

Defendants-appellants, claimants of a parcel of realty through a deed granted by the Department of Natural Resources, appeal from an order of the circuit court determining that the other defendants, the record title holders of the same premises, were the true owners.

This appeal arose from proceedings instituted by the City of Flint to acquire the parcel pursuant to the Uniform Condemnation Procedures Act, MCL 213.51 et seq.; MSA 8.265(1) et seq. In an addendum to its complaint, the city listed as "interested parties” the record title holders as well as the grantees of a deed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Dow v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Municipal Investors Ass'n v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hagerl v. Auto Club Group InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Municipal Investors Assn. v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brandon Township v. TomkowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. State of Mich.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
  3. Howard v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. City of Detroit v. AdamoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API