Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. State of Mich.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 27, 1996No. 1:96-cv-00788PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. In its complaint, Plaintiff seeks to quiet title to certain real property located in Lansing, Michigan. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant County of Ingham failed to give pre-sale and post-sale notice of the tax sale of the property as required under Michigan law. Therefore, Plaintiff contends that its constitutional right to due process has been violated and institutes this action to quiet title and obtain injunctive relief.

Facts

Plaintiff, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In Re Delorean Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Washington v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Dow v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Cliffs on the Bay Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Smith v. Cliffs on the Bay Condominium Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. AEP Industries, Inc. v. B.G. Properties, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Aep Industries Inc. v. B.G. Properties, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  5. HBKY, LLC v. Elk River Export, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API