Legal Opinion
Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. McGrattan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 26, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 792).
*626Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons. -
2Cited by7 opinions
- Scognamillo v. OlsenColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Somma v. GraceyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Donald P. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Reliance National Indemnity Company v. Alston Jennings, Jr. Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.