Detroit Motion Picture Projectionists Union, Local 199 v. Employment Relations Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentR. E. Noble, J.
I must respectfully dissent. I believe that doctrines limiting this Court’s review of Michigan Employment Relations Commission (MERC) decisions should not be invoked to let stand a clearly erroneous legal conclusion.
Defendant 96 Grand Corporation, owned by a four-person partnership named Krim Enterprises, leased a movie theater in Farmington and approached plaintiff, a union representing movie *462projectionists, with an invitation to bargain over projectionists’ terms and conditions of employment. In December, 1972, the parties reached a temporary oral agreement concerning wages to be paid…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- American Ship Building Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.