Legal Opinion

In re J.P.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 26, 2020No. 118790PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,790 In the Matter of J.P. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT In an extended-jurisdiction juvenile proceeding, the district court gives a juvenile offender both a juvenile sentence and an adult sentence. The adult sentence is stayed on the condition that the juvenile substantially comply with the terms of the juvenile sentence and not commit a new offense. But if one of those conditions is violated, the district court must impose the adult sentence. When it does so, the court's order imposing the adult sentence is a final judgment appealable under K.S.A.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wiechman v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. Kargus v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Williams v. LawtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. ToothmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. State v. SchusterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re I.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. A.D.T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. In re D.J.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  4. In re J.S.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. In re K.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API